Review



magnetic separation kit  (Miltenyi Biotec)


Bioz Verified Symbol Miltenyi Biotec is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Miltenyi Biotec manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Miltenyi Biotec magnetic separation kit
    Magnetic Separation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 179 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/10__1016_slash_j__jtocrr__2026__101049-92-15-18
    Average 96 stars, based on 179 article reviews
    magnetic separation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Isolation:

    Article Title: Functional Characterization of a Novel Intronic Complement Factor I Variant in Factor I Deficiency and aHUS
    Article Snippet: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from EDTA-anticoagulated blood using Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation (17144003, Cytiva). .. Monocytes were subsequently isolated with the Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit (130-117-3370, Miltenyi Biotec). .. The enriched monocytes were then cultured for 6 days in the presence of GM-CSF (800 IU/mL) and IL-4 (250 IU/mL) (Miltenyi Biotec).

    Article Title: BCMA/TACI antigen-binding molecules
    Article Snippet: PBMCs were isolated from fresh blood of 3 donors using SepMateTM Tubes with Histopaque®-1077 (Sigma, 10771-500ML). .. Monocytes were isolated from the PBMCs using Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit (Miltenyi, #130-117-337). ..

    Article Title: The Interplay of M1 Macrophages and Dental Pulp Stem Cells Promotes Angiogenesis Through IL-8-Dependent VEGF Regulation: An In Vitro Study.
    Article Snippet: .. CD14+ monocytes were isolated using the Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. .. Monocytes were cultured at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well in 6- well plates for 7 days in RPMI 1640 media, supplemented with 10% heatinactivated human serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and Macrophage colony- stimulating factor (MCSF) (Sigma- Aldrich) 20 ng/mL.

    Article Title: RANKL inhibits macrophage proinflammatory Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 signaling and impairs killing of intracellular bacteria.
    Article Snippet: .. Human CD14+ monocytes were negatively selected from commercially sourced peripheral blood mononuclear cells (ZenBio) from healthy donors using the Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit (Miltenyi) following manufacturer instructions. .. Human monocytes were seeded in tissue culture plates in complete MEM-α with 50 ng/mL recombinant human M-CSF (R&D systems) and differentiated into macrophages over 7 d with a media change at day 3.

    Article Title: Interleukin-9 Regulates NF-kB-Mediated Activation of Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis Brain
    Article Snippet: .. Monocytes were purified using a human classical monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). ..

    Article Title: Monocytes and neutrophils promote cardiac fibroblast pro-fibrotic phenotypes through IL-6 and MIF
    Article Snippet: .. CD14 ++ CD16 − monocytes were isolated with the Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). .. PBMC pellets were resuspended with 300 μL of pre-cold Buffer Solution and mixed with 100 μL of Classical Monocyte Biotin-Antibody Cocktail, 100 μL of CD61 Microbeads and 50 μL of Thrombocyte Removal Reagent and then incubated for 5 min at room temperature.

    Article Title: Use of plant composition, traditional Chinese medicine composition in preparing medicine for treating COVID-19
    Article Snippet: .. Monocyte Isolation and Cytokine Array Assay: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are isolated from blood samples of healthy donors; that is, PBMCs are isolated from whole blood using Ficoll-PaqueTM density gradient centrifugation, and monocytes (98% pure CD14+) were isolated from PBMCs by using a classical monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). ..

    Purification:

    Article Title: Interleukin-9 Regulates NF-kB-Mediated Activation of Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis Brain
    Article Snippet: .. Monocytes were purified using a human classical monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). ..

    Gradient Centrifugation:

    Article Title: Use of plant composition, traditional Chinese medicine composition in preparing medicine for treating COVID-19
    Article Snippet: .. Monocyte Isolation and Cytokine Array Assay: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are isolated from blood samples of healthy donors; that is, PBMCs are isolated from whole blood using Ficoll-PaqueTM density gradient centrifugation, and monocytes (98% pure CD14+) were isolated from PBMCs by using a classical monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). ..



    Similar Products

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec magnetic separation kit
    Magnetic Separation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/10__1016_slash_j__jtocrr__2026__101049-92-15-18
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    magnetic separation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec classical monocyte isolation kit
    Classical Monocyte Isolation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/pmc13227212-56-6-11
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    classical monocyte isolation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec magnetic purification 138
    Magnetic Purification 138, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/10__1016_slash_j__bneo__2026__100264-110-11-14
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    magnetic purification 138 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec classical monocytes isolation kit
    Classical Monocytes Isolation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/pm42214748-83-13-17
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    classical monocytes isolation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Miltenyi Biotec pan monocyte isolation kit
    Monocytes transfer mitochondria via extracellular vesicles . (A) Western blot analysis of EV markers CD63 and CD81 in THP‐1 EVs and THP‐1 cell lysate. CD81 and CD63 were detected in the EV fraction, confirming successful EV <t>isolation.</t> (B) Quantification of CD31 protein in THP‐1‐derived EVs ( n = 4) by ELISA. EVs derived from HEK293T cells ( n = 3) were used as negative controls. (C) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) BM‐MNCs obtained from four newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from PBMC‐derived <t>monocyte</t> culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or <t>anti‐CD31</t> pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cells (CD138 + CD38 + CD33 − ) was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each data point represents an individual patient sample . P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (D–G) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) MM cell lines, (D) UM9, (E) RPMI‐8226, (F) MM.1S, and (G) U266, were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cell lines was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, performed in duplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (H, I) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) UM9 cells were incubated with unlabeled Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or with sonicated Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the absolute mitochondrial membrane potential (H) was assessed using the MTDR probe, and the total mitochondrial content (I) of UM9 cells was measured using the MTG probe with flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, each performed in duplicate or triplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (J) Representative dot plots illustrate the gating strategy used to identify CD138 + MM cells in BM‐MNCs from patients co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. CD138 + MM cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring MTDR fluorescence in all CD138 + MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in all CD138 + MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). (K) Representative dot plots show the gating strategy used to identify MM cell lines co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. Cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Subsequently, CD33⁻CD138 + MM cells were distinguished. Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring the MTDR fluorescence in MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and each significance is indicated with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not significant. ANOVA, analysis of variance; BM‐MNCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; EV, extracellular vesicles; MM, multiple myeloma; MTDR, MitoTracker Deep Red; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
    Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/classical+monocyte+isolation+kit/Classical+Monocyte+Isolation+Kit%2C+human/pmc13084703-26-20-24
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pan monocyte isolation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Monocytes transfer mitochondria via extracellular vesicles . (A) Western blot analysis of EV markers CD63 and CD81 in THP‐1 EVs and THP‐1 cell lysate. CD81 and CD63 were detected in the EV fraction, confirming successful EV isolation. (B) Quantification of CD31 protein in THP‐1‐derived EVs ( n = 4) by ELISA. EVs derived from HEK293T cells ( n = 3) were used as negative controls. (C) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) BM‐MNCs obtained from four newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from PBMC‐derived monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cells (CD138 + CD38 + CD33 − ) was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each data point represents an individual patient sample . P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (D–G) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) MM cell lines, (D) UM9, (E) RPMI‐8226, (F) MM.1S, and (G) U266, were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cell lines was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, performed in duplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (H, I) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) UM9 cells were incubated with unlabeled Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or with sonicated Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the absolute mitochondrial membrane potential (H) was assessed using the MTDR probe, and the total mitochondrial content (I) of UM9 cells was measured using the MTG probe with flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, each performed in duplicate or triplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (J) Representative dot plots illustrate the gating strategy used to identify CD138 + MM cells in BM‐MNCs from patients co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. CD138 + MM cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring MTDR fluorescence in all CD138 + MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in all CD138 + MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). (K) Representative dot plots show the gating strategy used to identify MM cell lines co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. Cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Subsequently, CD33⁻CD138 + MM cells were distinguished. Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring the MTDR fluorescence in MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and each significance is indicated with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not significant. ANOVA, analysis of variance; BM‐MNCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; EV, extracellular vesicles; MM, multiple myeloma; MTDR, MitoTracker Deep Red; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

    Journal: HemaSphere

    Article Title: Monocyte‐mediated metabolic rewiring via CD31‐CD38 interactions promotes growth and drug‐resistance in multiple myeloma

    doi: 10.1002/hem3.70358

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Monocytes transfer mitochondria via extracellular vesicles . (A) Western blot analysis of EV markers CD63 and CD81 in THP‐1 EVs and THP‐1 cell lysate. CD81 and CD63 were detected in the EV fraction, confirming successful EV isolation. (B) Quantification of CD31 protein in THP‐1‐derived EVs ( n = 4) by ELISA. EVs derived from HEK293T cells ( n = 3) were used as negative controls. (C) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) BM‐MNCs obtained from four newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from PBMC‐derived monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cells (CD138 + CD38 + CD33 − ) was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each data point represents an individual patient sample . P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (D–G) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) MM cell lines, (D) UM9, (E) RPMI‐8226, (F) MM.1S, and (G) U266, were incubated with MTDR + Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or sonicated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the MTDR signal in MM cell lines was measured by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, performed in duplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (H, I) Solvent control or daratumumab pretreated (Dara; α‐CD38) UM9 cells were incubated with unlabeled Mt‐EVs isolated from THP‐1 monocyte culture supernatant (Mt‐EV), or anti‐CD31 pretreated MTDR + Mt‐EVs (α‐CD31), or with sonicated Mt‐EVs (sonicated Mt‐EV). After 12 h, the absolute mitochondrial membrane potential (H) was assessed using the MTDR probe, and the total mitochondrial content (I) of UM9 cells was measured using the MTG probe with flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, each performed in duplicate or triplicate. P‐values were calculated using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (J) Representative dot plots illustrate the gating strategy used to identify CD138 + MM cells in BM‐MNCs from patients co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. CD138 + MM cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring MTDR fluorescence in all CD138 + MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in all CD138 + MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). (K) Representative dot plots show the gating strategy used to identify MM cell lines co‐cultured with MTDR + Mt‐EVs. Cells were gated based on morphology (FSC‐A vs. SSC‐A), followed by selection of single cells (FSC‐A vs. FSC‐H) and live cells (Near‐IR negative cells). Subsequently, CD33⁻CD138 + MM cells were distinguished. Transfer of MTDR + Mt‐EVs to MM cells was assessed by measuring the MTDR fluorescence in MM cells after 12 h of co‐culture. Representative flow cytometry histogram overlays show MTDR signal in MM under different treatment conditions: Mt‐EV, Mt‐EV + Dara, Mt‐EV + α‐CD31, and Sonicated Mt‐EV (top to bottom). A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and each significance is indicated with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not significant. ANOVA, analysis of variance; BM‐MNCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay; EV, extracellular vesicles; MM, multiple myeloma; MTDR, MitoTracker Deep Red; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were enriched for monocytes using immunomagnetic MACS magnetic beads coated with antibodies against CD14, according to the manufacturer's instructions (pan Monocyte Isolation Kit; Miltenyi; Cat# 130‐117‐337).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Isolation, Derivative Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Solvent, Control, Incubation, Sonication, Flow Cytometry, Membrane, Cell Culture, Selection, Fluorescence, Co-Culture Assay